August 2011
The general standard of the entries was quite impressive. Most of the reviews were of a fine quality and it was apparent that the writers had a firm grasp of what a review should look like. These were a pleasure to read. A few of the entries were not up to the general standard, and I would advise these writers to expose themselves to more well-written reviews to pick up a few tips, as well as to write more often. In reviewing, one should bring together analytical thinking while also expressing a personal response to the book. The winning review is the one that I feel achieved this balance the best, at the same time displaying a talent for writing. I encourage all the entrants to continue to write, as there are some talented writers in this bunch who have what it takes. Well done to everyone.
